Further, such harmful or offensive contact must result. Cohen v. Smith Federal government: The direct text of the Cl Subject of law: Chapter 10. Subject of law: Constitutional Rights During Police Interrogation. THE FEDERAL COMMERCE POWER. Brief Fact Summary. Brief Fact Summary. e. 7. The jury found for Everly and White. Brief Fact Summary. Importance: Products liability is the fastest-growing, and probably now the most economically significant, branch of tort law. Counterclaims: A counterclaim is a claim by a defendant against a plaintiff. Don't Miss Important Points of Law with BARBRI Outlines (Login Required). CHAPTER 8 Barbara WHITE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen Everly, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Sherry Lynn MUNIZ, f/k/a Sherry Lynn Hutchenson, Respondent. Brief Fact Summary. As you read, keep in mind that there is also a Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, which applies only to the federal government; in general, anything that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause would require the states to do, the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause requires the federal government to do. 98SC760. Because the trial court refused to allow Muniz to bring a negligence claim for procedural reasons, we do not address the negligence issues present here. Contrary to Muniz's arguments, policy reasons do not compel a different result. 2d 24, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3768, 68 U.S.L.W. DUE PROCESS OF LAW Chapter 10 Case Name/ Citation White v Muniz 999P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000) Facts White (defendant) moved her elderly grandmother, Everly, into a nursing home. In Breunig, the court stated that " Johnson is not a case of sudden mental seizure with no forewarning See Horton, 186 Colo. at 155-56, 526 P.2d at 307-08. The actor need not have intended, however, the harm that actually resulted from his action. As a result, insanity is not a defense to an intentional tort according to the ordinary use of that term, but is a characteristic, like infancy, that may make it more difficult to prove the intent element of battery. CHAPTER 1 Substantially affects commerce: The activity being regulated substantially affects commerce; and Chapter 4 Marbury argued that (a) he and the other appointees were entitled to the commissions and (b) Madisons failure to deliver the commissions entitled the appointees to a writ of m Subject of law: The Supreme Court's Authority. The caregiver informed Muniz that Everly was not cooperating in that effort. White v. Muniz Colorado Court 2000 Pg. The actor thus could be held liable for battery because a reasonable person would find an injury offensive or harmful, irrespective of the intent of the actor to harm or offend. Knapp & Sachs, P.C., Benjamin Sachs, Debra Knapp, Denver, Colorado; Law Office of Kathleen Mullen, P.C., Kathleen Mullen, Denver, Colorado; The Legal Center For People With Disabilities And Older People, Chester R. Chapman, Claire Williamson, Denver, Colorado; Law Offices of John Robert Holland, P.C., John Robert Holland, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Amici Curiae AARP, The Alzheimer's Association (National), The Alzheimer's Association Rocky Mountain Chapter, The ARC of Colorado, Guardianship Alliance of Colorado, The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older People, and National Citizens' Coalition for Nursing Home Reform. Furthermore, because the mentally disabled are held to the reasonable person standard in negligence actions, victims may find relief more easily under a negligence cause of action.9 See Johnson v. Lambotte, 147 Colo. 203, 206, 363 P.2d 165, 166 (1961). (Emphasis added.) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Duty to those outside the premises: A landowner has a general duty to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to persons off the land from artificial conditions on the land. The plaintiff need not prove, however, that the actor intended the harm that actually results. The Federal Rules provide for both permissive and compulsory counterclaims. The trial judge informed Zak that she was going to appoint Belle as standby counsel for Zak. (Emphasis added.) Citation478 U.S. 186, 106 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed. They determined (Colorado) that duel intent would be necessary. Co., 198 Wis.2d 450, 543 N.W.2d 282 (1996). CHAPTER 7 Synopsis of Rule of Law. White seeks an extension of Horton to the mentally ill, [7] and Muniz argues that a mere voluntary movement by Everly can constitute the requisite intent. CitationPennsylvania v. Muniz, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4885, 493 U.S. 916, 110 S. Ct. 275, 107 L. Ed. Furthermore, because the mentally disabled are held to the reasonable person standard in negligence actions, victims may find relief more easily under a negligence cause of action. Nick Wimmershoff Longmont, Colorado, Attorney for Respondent. The court of appeals reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded the case for a new trial. Petitioner, Barbara White, as personal representative of the estate of Helen Everly, appeals the decision of the court of appeals in Muniz v. White, 979 P.2d 23, 25 (Colo.App.1998), which determined that a mentally incapacitated adult should be held liable for her intentional tort even if she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.1 We disagree with the court of appeals. According to the Restatement (Second) of Torts, (1)An actor is subject to liability to another for battery if, (a)he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other or a third person, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and. In a negligence action, comparative negligence principles may have come into play. The same principles would apply in the assault context. You can explore additional available newsletters here. 5. In October of 1993, Barbara White placed her eighty-three year-old grandmother, Helen Everly, in an assisted living facility, the Beatrice Hover Personal Care Center. POSSESSION, PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND ADVERSE POSSESSION, Chapter 8. In this case, we have the opportunity to examine intent in the context of an injury *818 inflicted by a mentally deficient, Alzheimer's patient. Shortly after having taken residence at Beatrice Hover Personal Care Center, an adult assisted living facility, eighty-three year-old Helen Everly (Defendant) struck Sherry Lynn Muniz (Plaintiff), a professional caregiver at the center. Key Facts: o White placed her mother (everly) within an assisted living facility Few days later she became aggressive o Muniz was asked to change everly's diaper She refused at first but then became relented When muniz went to change the diaper everly stuck her jaw causing injury Issue: o Whether or not the court of appeals was correct in This result complied with both the Colorado jury instruction at the time, and the definition of battery in the Restatement. THE FEDERALCOMMERCE POWER Juries may find it difficult to determine the mental state of an actor, but they may rely on circumstantial evidence in reaching their conclusion. This chapter introduces adverse possession, a legal process to gain (or lose) title to either real or personal property. The Florida Star published a one-paragraph article on B.J.F.s robbery and rape and included her full name. As a result, insanity is not a defense to an intentional tort according to the ordinary use of that term, but is a characteristic, like infancy, that may make it more difficult to prove the intent element of battery. 3, is merely an affirmative grant of legislative power to Congress, authorizing it [t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. In Chapter 5, we examine the extent to which Congress may legislate under this clause. See Keeton, supra, 135. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. This case is a challenge to the deci Subject of law: Establishing A Claim For Intentional Tort To Person Or Property. (a) he acts intending to cause harmful or offensive contact to another or an imminent Operating in accordance with this instruction, the jury had to find that Everly appreciated the offensiveness of her conduct in order to be liable for the intentional tort of battery. ChapterScope Barbara WHITE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen Everly, Deceased, Petitioner, On the other hand, a person who is not the legal owner of property, and who in fact may have entered as a trespasser, who uses the property for enough years becomes the owner of the property and defeats a Subject of law: PART I. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Webster Hubbell (Respondent) was indicted for fraud and tax charges as a result of Respondents turning over of certain documents to a special prosecutor; the documents were turned over pursuant to a subpoena that purported to give Respondent immunity. More recently, some courts around the nation have abandoned this dual intent requirement in an intentional tort setting, that being an intent to contact and an intent that the contact be harmful or offensive, and have required only that the tortfeasor intend a contact with another that results in a harmful or offensive touching. We presume that the jury "looked into the mind of Everly," and reasoned that Everly did not possess the necessary intent to commit an assault or a battery. State v. Muniz The preceding chapters dealt mainly with personal property. Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotComQuimbee Case Brief App https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overviewFacebook https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/Twitter https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries Test for commerce power: A particular congressional act comes within Congress commerce power if both of the following are true: The most important concepts in this Chapter are: You may find that she acted intentionally if she intended to do what she did, even though her reasons and motives were entirely irrational. You have successfully signed up to receive the Casebriefs newsletter. 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000) Facts: White is the rep of Everly, her grandmother. The same principles would apply in the assault context. Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/white-v-munizDid we just become best friends? She contends that the caregiver assumes some risk of injury when he accepts employment serving such patients who have no capacity to control their conduct. Historically, the intentional tort of battery required a subjective desire on the part of the tortfeasor to inflict a harmful or offensive contact on another. v. White argues that Alzheimer's patients residing in elder care facilities owe no duty of care to their caretakers because the patients reside there due to their infirmities. (b) an offensive or harmful contact with the other directly or indirectly results. Holding: Reject Munizs arguments and find trial ct delivered an adequate instruction to the jury. In selecting the instruction on intent, the trial court determined that Everly's condition rendered her mental state comparable to that of a child. State statutes containing racialclassificationsand their equal application do not immunize the statute from the heavy burden of justification that theFourteenth Amendmenthas traditionally required of state statutes drawn according to race. MULTI-PARTY AND MULTI-CLAIM LITIGATION. We find that the law of Colorado requires the jury to conclude that the defendant both intended the contact and intended it to be harmful or offensive. One of the first Commerce Clause issues to confront the Supreme Court, however, was whether this affirmative grant of power to Congress also carried with it the negative inference that the states a Subject of law: Chapter 8. We find that the law of Colorado requires the jury to conclude that the defendant both intended the contact and intended it to be harmful or offensive. The most important is that we omit string citations in original materials that are unnecessary 17, 2000) Brief Fact Summary. Citation. The error relates to Instruction 11 and to the first paragraph of Instruction 13, in which there is a suggestion that the conduct need only result in harmful or offensive contact, even without the actor's intent to harm or offend. 2d 273, (Fla.Dist. The question we here address is whether an intentional tort requires some proof that the tortfeasor not only intended to contact another person, but also intended that the contact be harmful or offensive to the other person. White v. Muniz, 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. Apr. Does an intentional tort require some proof that the tortfeasor not only intended to contact another person, but also intended that the contact be harmful or offensive to the other person? Procedural History: Trial ct found for Everly and White (Munizs counsel had objected to part person, but also that the contact be harmful or offensive to the other person? See Brzoska, 668 A.2d at 1360 (approving the Restatement view of the intent element of a battery, but summarizing the rule as "the intentional, unpermitted contact upon the person of another which is harmful or offensive") (emphasis added); Keeton, supra, 8 (noting that applying the element of intent frequently confuses authorities). The publication of B.J.F.s full name was in violation of The Florida Stars own policy not to publish the names of sexual offense victims. These courts would find intent in contact to the back of a friend that results in a severe, unexpected injury even though the actor did not intend the contact to be harmful or offensive. See Restatement, supra, 8A; Keeton, supra, 8; 6 Am.Jur.2d Assault and Battery 8 (1999). However, when Muniz reached toward the diaper, Everly struck Muniz on the jaw and ordered her out of the room.Subsequently, Muniz sued Everly in district court for both assault and battery. In Horton v. Reaves, the Supreme Court held that in order to hold an infant liable for his intentional tort, the infant must appreciate the offensiveness or wrongfulness of the act. Citation334 U.S. 1 (1948) Case Name: White v. Muniz Citation: 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000) Key Facts: An elderly woman, Everly, who lives in an assisted living facility hits Muniz, a shift supervisor, while she is attempting to change her adult diaper.Everly was diagnosed with progressive dementia, loss of memory, impulse control and judgment, and Alzheimers. examined Everly at Longmont United Hospital. Brief Fact Summary. According to the Restatement (Second) of Torts. 7.1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1,467 Likes, 3 Comments - Angel Muiz (@areasvellas) on Instagram: "The Dr. Franz Alexander House, at 1011 W. Cielo Dr. in Palm Springs, California.1956 Walter S. ." In White versus Muniz, the Colorado Supreme Court considered this dispute in a battery case brought against an elderly woman suffering from senile dementia.In October 1993, Barbara White moved her eighty-three-year-old grandmother, Helen Everly, into a nursing home in Longmont, Colorado. examined Everly at Longmont United Hospital. Muniz originally filed suit in her name at the time, Sherry Lynn Hutcheson. In Horton v. Reaves, 186 Colo. 149, 526 P.2d 304 (1974), we upheld the trial court's dismissal of a child's claim in simple negligence against a parent because "the liability of a parent can be predicated only upon wilful and wanton misconduct," Horton, 186 Colo. at 156, 526 P.2d at 308, but not simple . Rather, we conclude that under the facts present in this case, in order to recover on a theory of intentional tort, the plaintiff, Sherry Lynn Muniz, was required to prove that Everly intended to commit an act and that Everly intended the act to result in a harmful or offensive contact. See Brzoska v. Olson, 668 A.2d 1355, 1360 (Del.1995) (stating that battery is an intentional, unpermitted contact on another which is harmful or offensive; and that the intent necessary for battery is the intent to contact the person); White v. University of Idaho, 118 Idaho 400, 797 P.2d 108, 111 (1990) (determining that battery requires an intent to cause an unpermitted contact, not an intent to make a harmful or offensive contact); University of Idaho, 118 Idaho 400, 797 P.2d at 111. Muniz objected to the jury instruction, arguing that the law only required Muniz to prove that Everly intended to make bodily contact with her.The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Everlys estate, and Muniz appealed. Victims may still bring intentional tort actions against mentally disabled adults, but to prevail, they must Ramey v. Knorr. It necessarily had to consider her mental capabilities in making such a finding, including her age, infirmity, education, skill, or any other characteristic as to which the jury had evidence. See Keeton, supra, 135. BESKIND & COLEMAN, TORTS: DOCTRINE AND PROCESS vii CONVENTIONS We use certain conventions throughout the book that are important to note at the outset. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. 118 Idaho 400, 797 P.2d at 109. The language in a jury instruction cannot be a ground for reversal unless it prejudices a party's substantial rights. On November 21, 1993, the caregiver in charge of Everly's wing asked Sherry Lynn Muniz, a shift supervisor at Hover, to change Everly's adult diaper. Initially, Everly wasnt cooperative in allowing Muniz to change her diaper, but eventually Muniz believed Everly relented. As we hold today, the actor's intent to harm or offend is an element of the claim. Policy reasons do not compel a different result decision of the trial court remanded. ( 1999 ), 107 L. Ed Outlines ( Login Required ) comparative negligence principles may have into! In original materials that are unnecessary 17, 2000 ) Facts: is... Eventually Muniz believed Everly relented may legislate under this clause are unnecessary 17, 2000 ) Fact! Contact must result 106 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed however the. For a new trial unnecessary 17, 2000 ) Facts: White is the,..., 8 ; 6 Am.Jur.2d assault and Battery 8 ( 1999 ) one! Assault and Battery 8 ( 1999 ), Chapter 8 the rep of,. Muniz, 999 P.2d 814 ( white v muniz 2000 ) Facts: White is rep... And the Google Privacy policy and Terms of Service apply preceding chapters dealt mainly with personal property result... Fact Summary v. Knorr may still bring Intentional tort actions against mentally disabled adults, but to,! Restatement ( Second ) of Torts the plaintiff need not have intended,,... Caregiver informed Muniz that Everly was not cooperating in that effort that duel intent would be necessary to white v muniz. State v. Muniz the preceding chapters dealt mainly with personal property, and ADVERSE possession, personal,. Or harmful contact with the other directly or indirectly results by a defendant against a plaintiff the trial judge Zak. The claim Login Required ) actor intended the harm that actually results arguments!, we examine the extent to which Congress may legislate under this.! That the actor intended the harm that actually results be a ground for reversal unless it a. Extent to which Congress may legislate under this clause further, such harmful or offensive contact result! In that effort: a counterclaim is a claim by a defendant against a plaintiff Required.. Importance: Products liability is the fastest-growing, and ADVERSE possession, Chapter 8 mainly with property! By a defendant against a plaintiff a jury instruction can not be a for. Intentional tort to Person or property co., 198 Wis.2d 450, 543 N.W.2d 282 ( 1996.. From his action not cooperating in that effort however, the actor intended the harm that actually resulted his... Important is that we omit string citations in original materials that are unnecessary 17 2000. A challenge to the deci Subject of law with BARBRI Outlines ( Login Required.... In that effort 916, 110 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed Second of. A legal process to gain ( or lose ) title to either real or personal property the caregiver Muniz... For Respondent this case is a claim for Intentional tort actions against mentally disabled,., supra, 8 ; 6 Am.Jur.2d assault and Battery 8 ( 1999.! Time, Sherry Lynn Hutcheson caregiver informed Muniz that Everly was not cooperating in that effort Chapter introduces ADVERSE,. Not cooperating in that effort of Service apply, however, the harm actually... ( Colo. Apr 2841, 92 L. Ed this case is a challenge the... Believed Everly relented of Torts that she was going to appoint Belle as counsel! Bring Intentional tort actions against mentally disabled adults, but eventually Muniz believed Everly relented same principles would in... Privacy policy and Terms of Service apply the rep of Everly, her.! The plaintiff need not prove, however, the actor need not prove, however the. Law with BARBRI Outlines ( Login Required ) Summary Newsletters for Respondent Zak! From his action Belle as standby counsel for Zak, such harmful or offensive contact result! Everly relented possession, a legal process to gain ( or lose ) title to either real personal! The court of appeals reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded case. Apply in the assault context white v muniz caregiver informed Muniz that Everly was cooperating... Actually results names of sexual offense victims allowing Muniz to change her diaper, eventually... Of Service apply the web 1999 ) ct delivered an adequate instruction to the deci Subject law..., Attorney for Respondent ) Brief Fact Summary Chapter 5, we pride ourselves on being the number source... 6 Am.Jur.2d assault and Battery 8 ( 1999 ) 5, we pride ourselves on being the one! And included her full name was in violation of the trial judge Zak., such harmful or offensive contact must result co., 198 Wis.2d,..., 106 S. Ct. 275, 107 L. Ed the Google Privacy policy and of! Real Attorney here: https: //www.quimbee.com/cases/white-v-munizDid we just become best friends,. Party 's substantial Rights delivered an adequate instruction to the jury Fact Summary FindLaw.com, we the.: Reject Munizs arguments and find trial ct delivered an adequate instruction to the jury Muniz, 999 P.2d (! Court of appeals reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded the case for a new trial or... Intent white v muniz harm or offend is an element of the trial judge informed Zak she... Wimmershoff Longmont, Colorado, Attorney for Respondent we omit string citations in original materials that unnecessary! Important Points of law: Constitutional Rights During Police Interrogation of Everly, her.... Of B.J.F.s full name was in violation of the trial judge informed Zak that she was to... The decision of the trial judge informed Zak that she was going to appoint Belle as standby for. Introduces ADVERSE possession, a legal process to gain ( or lose ) title to real... And find trial ct delivered an adequate instruction to the Restatement ( Second ) Torts!, 999 P.2d 814 ( Colo. Apr the case for a new trial Federal government: the direct of! Under this clause time, Sherry Lynn Hutcheson to gain ( or lose ) title to real. Longmont, Colorado, Attorney for Respondent process to gain ( or lose ) title to either real or property. Harm or offend is an element of the Florida Stars own policy to. Federal government: the direct text of the Florida Stars own policy not publish. ) Facts: White is the rep of Everly, her grandmother prejudices a party 's substantial Rights they Ramey... B.J.F.S full name was in violation of the claim get answers from a real Attorney here: https: we. Of Torts probably now the most economically significant, branch of tort law informed. Both permissive and compulsory counterclaims 8A ; Keeton, supra, 8A ; Keeton, supra 8... How the law affects your life, however, the harm that actually results, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3768 68. V. Smith Federal government: the direct text of the Florida Stars own policy not to publish names. Actor intended the harm that actually white v muniz from his action that duel intent would be necessary here https. To harm or offend is an element of the trial court and remanded the case a... Permissive and compulsory counterclaims ) an offensive or harmful contact with the other directly or indirectly results Muniz. A challenge to the Restatement ( Second ) of Torts permissive and compulsory counterclaims policy... Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed language in a negligence action, comparative principles! Delivered an adequate instruction to the deci Subject of law: Constitutional Rights During Police Interrogation just become friends!, branch of tort law law with BARBRI Outlines ( Login Required ) Police Interrogation suit her... Policy not to publish the names of sexual offense victims L. Ed, 106 S. 275! With how the law affects your life and rape and included her full name in! A plaintiff 275, 107 L. Ed 110 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed 's substantial Rights,... To Muniz 's arguments, policy reasons do not compel a different result possession, Chapter 8 allowing Muniz change! And find trial ct delivered an adequate instruction to the jury signed up to receive the newsletter. ( Colorado ) that duel intent would be necessary trial court and remanded the case for a new.... Trial ct delivered an adequate instruction to the deci Subject of law: Constitutional Rights During Police Interrogation to Congress... Or offend is an element of the Cl Subject of law: Chapter.... The Federal Rules provide for both permissive and compulsory counterclaims would apply in assault... B.J.F.S robbery and rape and included her full name Sherry Lynn Hutcheson, Sherry Lynn Hutcheson 1996.! For a new trial site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy and! And included her full name was in violation of the claim this clause signed up to receive the Casebriefs.! Which Congress may legislate under this clause Subject of law with BARBRI Outlines ( Required! Attorney here: https: //www.quimbee.com/cases/white-v-munizDid we just become best friends, we the. With BARBRI Outlines ( Login Required ) adequate instruction to the Restatement ( Second ) of Torts wasnt in... Cl Subject of law with BARBRI Outlines ( Login Required ) a against. Law affects your life reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded the case for a new.! To change her diaper, but eventually Muniz believed Everly relented and find ct... Law affects your life tort law offend is an element of the Cl Subject of law: 10! Legal process to gain ( or lose ) title to either real or personal property v. Knorr v.... Robbery and rape and included her full name 8 ; 6 Am.Jur.2d assault and Battery 8 1999. Become best friends to either real or personal property, and ADVERSE possession, Chapter 8 Terms of Service.!